This new product, The Osmosis Pur Medical Skincare UV
Neutralizer Harmonized Water, claims to offer SPF 30 protection against the sun’s
harmful UV rays. The product claims to provide protection for up to three hours
in the sun. A 100ml bottle will cost you around $30.
Apparently, the product manufacturers claim that this
drinkable sunscreen causes the water molecules just below the surface of your
skin to vibrate. That vibration results in frequency emissions that cancel out
the frequencies of UVA and UVB radiation – the ones that cause sunburn and
potentially melanoma. Oh, and the product comes in tan enhancing and no tan
enhancing formulas!
Too good to be true? Maybe.
Dermatologists and many other health professionals are
skeptical that an ingestible product will prevent an external event such as
sunburn and skin cancers. There is no scientific-based data to support the
product’s claims, especially the concept that water can cause vibrations within
the body. According to several news reports, the company itself did little
research on the product before rolling it out. There were no independent or
clinical trials. The drinkable substance was tested on about 50 people who
claimed to stay in the sun for extended periods of time and found they were
sufficiently protected. We know nothing about these 50 people, their health
status, or potential motive for testing the liquid.
Furthermore, there’s another problem with this product: if
you’re on certain medications, the it may not work. According to the Evergreen,
Colorado-based company, “certain medications that have been identified as ‘sun-sensitizing’
may result in little to no sun protection if UV Water is your only form of
protection.” The site lists hundreds of medications (including many
over-the-counter drugs and supplements) for which this product may not work
including acetaminophen (Tylenol), naproxen (Aleve), paroxetine (Paxil), fluoxetine
(Prozac), St. John’s Wort, Dong Quai, Vitamin A, sertraline HCI (Zoloft), and
many more. Even saccharin, the artificial sweetener, made the list.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration did not mention this product
or any investigation of this product on its website. However, it may be
considered a supplement, thus, it would not require an FDA review or approval. A
similar product made by DliSODin Skin Nutrients is also available but by
prescription only. It requires consumption at least 15 days before spending
time in the sun. Again, if the product is considered a supplement, it would not
require FDA scrutiny.
Yet, the likelihood of a drinkable substance for sun
protection is not necessarily science fiction. According to many journals on
nutrition and food, sun protection can come from your body’s internal
mechanism, mainly from nutrients found in foods like the phytochemicals in
grapes, berries, and walnuts, and sulforaphane in broccoli. In fact, food research
found that the traditional Greek-style Mediterranean diet may contribute to the
low rates of melanoma in that region. From an alternative health view, certain
herbs can produce antioxidant activities that resist UV rays. Water was not
among any of the substances studied. However, research showed that certain herbs
only offer supplemental protection to an externally applied product.
Despite the potential help from internal sources that can
protect against harmful UV rays, Osmosis’ product is too new to have
substantial and conclusive research published for the industry or consumer.
Your best bet is to continue your typical regimen and deal with the greasy sunscreens.
It has proven to be the best defense against the sun so far.
Sources Used for this Article:
Korac, R. R. and Khambholja, K. M. (2011). Potential of
herbs in skin protection from ultraviolet radiation. Pharmacognosy Reviews,
5(10), 164-173.Osmosis Pur Medical Skincare. (2014). UV Neutralizer-Tan. Retrieved from http://www.osmosisskincare.com/HarmonizedWater-UV.aspx.
Q13Fox News Staff. (2014). Should you trust drinkable sunscreen? Retrieved from http://q13fox.com/2014/05/27/should-you-trust-drinkable-sunscreen/#axzz33CtbL8OF.
Shapria, N. (2010). Nutritional approach to sun protection: a suggested complement to external strategies. Nutrition Reviews, 68(2), 75-86.
Time Magazine. (2014). Dermatologists are skeptical of new “drinkable” SPF. Retrieved from http://time.com/#119534/dermatologists-are-skeptical-of-new-drinkable-spf/.
No comments:
Post a Comment